Friday, July 17, 2009

Calling all Attendees: You Choose how you want to Learn.

It seems clear. The future of events is in the direction of facilitated attendees experience. As a myriad of Social Media tools in hand with explosions in cell phone technology allows for engagement among attendees at any meeting and conference, I have been struck by a curious idea. Will we reach a point when attendees will be free to choose their own experience for a given learning objective? That is to say, will organizations be willing to create a portfolio of events all with the same objective?

For example: Lets say your organization wants employees to learn about Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethical Business Practices. Based on that learning objective, the event team create a series of learning modules for attendees to choose from. An experiential learner: head to China for a week to visit the factor where widgets are made. A tech-learner: a Web 2.0 environment lets attendees engage in an experience with colleagues from around the globe. A thought leader: Attend the executive summit over the weekend where small group interactive learning is the rule of thumb.

As a side note, there would appear to be value in this idea for cross-organizational learning opportunities. Consider it: the top organizations in the world create learning modules which attendees can pay to attend for continuing education. As an employer, dollars are dedicated for key talent development and those can be spent for a week at Google Camp or as a flavor creator for Ben and Jerry's. For the sponsors of the such learning programs, return is reaped from increased brand affinity and fresh ideas from outside the organization. For the individual learner, the are able to take a Liberal Arts approach to their life-long development choosing the experiences which are best suited to their development needs. Yes, this may be the Disney-ification of education - but for experience based learners is that a bad thing?


Thanks to @jaysmet for engaging with me on this converstation.

No comments:

Post a Comment